Centre for Ethics Seminar Series - Prof. Melissa Williams
| What |
|
|---|---|
| When |
Jan 16, 2012 from 03:00 PM to 05:00 PM |
| Where | Larkin Building, Room 200 |
| Add event to calendar |
|
Speaker: Professor Melissa Williams, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto
Talk Title: "Intercultural Political Theory, Globalization and Democratic Agency"
Abstract:
This paper argues that there is an internal link between three things:
globalization, the future of democracy, and the academic field of
comparative or intercultural political theory. These themes are linked
through the idea that addressing the human-scale problems characteristic
of intensive processes of globalization can take a genuinely democratic
form only under conditions where it is possible for citizens around the
world to form shared political imaginaries in which they see themselves
not only as connected to one another but also as possessing the ethical
responsibility and the agent-capacity to render these processes
responsive to those whom they affect. Since the formation of imagined
communities of shared fate is linguistically mediated, people who seek
to assert democratic agency over global problems need ideational
resources that resonate with locally embedded understandings of ethics
and politics in order for mutual interdependence and affectedness to
generate ways to “imagine the world differently” (to borrow the slogan
of the World Social Forum). We highlight the contributions of
comparative political theory to the common pool of ideational resources
from which political actors can draw in discovering the languages
through which to construct new, democracy-enabling, political
imaginaries. Drawing on theoretical accounts of the pragmatics of
language use, we have suggested that comparative political theory can
help to render articulate and explicit an array of ideas about
politics which, when taken up by political actors, can help to motivate
citizens to take responsibility for rendering the processes of
globalization more responsive to demands for democratic accountability.
Finally, we argue that advancing work in comparative political theory is
an institutional as well as an intellectual challenge, and describe one
collaborative project animated by this supposition.
