BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Department of Philosophy - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Department of Philosophy
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Department of Philosophy
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Toronto
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20240310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20241103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20260308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20261101T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250321T150000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250321T170000
DTSTAMP:20260421T020451
CREATED:20250108T214604Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250319T191514Z
UID:32193-1742569200-1742576400@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Continental Philosophy Research Group Talk (James Bahoh\, Memphis)
DESCRIPTION:The Continental Philosophy Research Group is pleased to welcome as guest speaker James Bahoh\, an assistant professor at the University of Memphis\, where he also serves as the Department of Philosophy’s director of undergraduate studies. Dr. Bahoh’s main research is in phenomenology\, post-phenomenological Continental philosophy\, and ontology/metaphysics in the context of German and French thought from Kant to today. He is especially interested in Heidegger and Deleuze and is a proponent of drawing on the history of philosophy to advance and address issues in 21st-century postanalytic/continental divide philosophy. He also has interests in social and political\, as well as early modern philosophy. \nDr. Bahoh is author of Heidegger’s Ontology of Events (2020) and is currently working on a new book on the relation of the concept of event to the metaphysics and ontology of identity\, difference\, and representation. The book focuses on the theories of events advanced by Heidegger and Deleuze\, and ways these theories engage Kant and post-Kantian thought. Since May 2024\, Dr. Bahoh has served as Presiding Officer of the Heidegger Circle Executive Committee. \nIn addition to his talk on March 21\, Dr. Bahoh will also be giving an all-day workshop the following day\, Saturday\, March 22\, 2025\, in JHB 418. To register for the workshop and for more information\, please contact Tarek Dika. \nTalk Title\nHeidegger on Fundamental Principles \nTalk Abstract\nIn this paper\, I examine the role of Grundsätze or ‘fundamental principles’ in Heidegger’s critique of metaphysics and in his larger ontology. I outline his distinction between ‘positive’ and ‘radical’ modes of science to show a major problem that the ‘recuperative’ dimension of his critique of metaphysics raises: that of simultaneously differentiating between and establishing the systematic unity of metaphysics and ontology. I focus on the way key principles like identity\, non-contradiction\, and reason are suggested to have a foundational position in metaphysical inquiry but simultaneously an openness to deeper ontological grounding. And on this basis\, I argue that these principles act as liminal concepts that help to solve the difference/unity problem. \nAbout the Continental Philosophy Group\nOne of six departmental research interest groups\, the Continental Philosophy Group works in the traditions of textual interpretation of human consciousness\, phenomenology\, and post-structuralist critical theory\, among other related traditions of thought.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/continental-philosophy-research-group-talk-james-bahoh-memphis/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building 519
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George,UTM,UTSC
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/james-bahoh-philosophy-utoronto-guest-lecturer.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250321T150000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250321T170000
DTSTAMP:20260421T020451
CREATED:20250318T025429Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250319T215257Z
UID:32330-1742569200-1742576400@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Ethics and Political Philosophy Group Talk (Rahul Kumar\, Queen's University)
DESCRIPTION:The Ethics and Political Philosophy Research Group is pleased to welcome as guest speaker Rahul Kumar\, professor and head of the Department of Philosophy at Queen’s University. His  primary research examines questions in non-consequentialist ethical theory\, with particular focus on the strengths and pitfalls of Scanlon’s contractualism as a systematic expression of a non-consequentialist approach to the foundations of interpersonal obligation. \nThis is an in-person event\, but those unable to come to campus may join the lecture via Zoom. \nTalk Title\nContractualism and Non-Identity: A Reassessment \nTalk Abstract\nA person must decide between conceiving a child now or waiting a few months. If they conceive now\, the child will most likely be born with significant physical impairments.  But if they both delay and undertake a course of medication\, this risk will be significantly reduced. Intuitively\, many want to say that delaying is what is owed to the prospective child. The non-identity problem implies that this thought is confused. Delaying is not owed to the child because a decision to conceive now does not wrong them. That is\, the child born of that decision cannot say “you owed it to me to have delayed conception\,” as delaying would not have resulted in their being born with better prospects. Someone else would have been born instead. In previous work\, I’ve argued that if we reason about this kind of case in Scanlonian contractualist terms\, we can straightforwardly make sense of the claim that choosing to conceive now rather than delaying is wrong because doing so wrongs the prospective child. In this paper\, I revisit my position in light of certain plausible arguments that cast doubt on its cogency. In particular\, I will focus on two questions. First\, is the account of wronging I employ is too impersonal to do justice to intuitive convictions concerning the interpersonal significance of wronging? And second\, what rests on being able to say that choosing to conceive now rather delaying wrongs the prospective child?  \nAbout the Ethics and Political Philosophy Group\nThe Ethics and Political Philosophy Group meets periodically throughout the year to discuss topics in value theory and related fields\, including meta-ethics\, normative ethics\, applied ethics\, social and political philosophy\, philosophy of law\, moral psychology\, practical reason\, agency\, and identity.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/ethics-and-political-philosophy-rahul-kumar-queens-university/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building\, Room 418\, 170 St. George Street\, Toronto\, Ontario\, M5R 2M8\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/rahul-kumar-philosophy-utoronto-guest-lecturer.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR