BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Department of Philosophy - ECPv6.17.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Department of Philosophy
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Toronto
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20260308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20261101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20270314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20271107T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260826T150000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260826T170000
DTSTAMP:20260811T181011Z
CREATED:20260811T181011Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260811T181011Z
UID:35293-1787756400-1787763600@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:The courtesy of phenomenology
DESCRIPTION:Speaker: Jocelyn Benoist\, University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne \nPhenomenology starts from a presupposition: that it is meaningful to treat everything as “appearing.” This postulate is\, of course\, linked to the Western metaphysics of subjectivity\, of which phenomenology is the ultimate product—even if phenomenologists claim regularly to overcome it. This unconditional application of the notion of “appearing” raises a grammatical problem\, for the verb “to appear” seems to have quite specific conditions of use that are incompatible with any absolutization. A self-sufficiency of appearing is just inconceivable. In other words\, there are ontological conditions to phenomenology. Highlighting these\, however\, will only be the first step of my analysis. These ontological conditions would not make it possible by themselves to understand the need and necessity for the language game of “appearing.” A second critical step has therefore to be made\, which\, by way of a certain linguistic and anthropological comparativism\, may disclose the logic underlying the discourse of “appearing.” This logic\, as we shall see\, is essentially social. Thus\, we must return its “courtesy” to phenomenology finally.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/the-courtesy-of-phenomenology/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building\, Room 418\, 170 St. George Street\, Toronto\, Ontario\, M5R 2M8\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025-07-ActuParis1-JocelynBenoist-v2-cropped.jpg.png
ORGANIZER;CN="Tarek Dika":MAILTO:tarek.dika@utoronto.ca
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260904T150000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260904T170000
DTSTAMP:20260811T183803Z
CREATED:20260811T183151Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260811T183803Z
UID:35298-1788534000-1788541200@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:What Does It Mean that the Idea Is the truth
DESCRIPTION:Speaker: Mark Alznauer (Northwestern) \nMore info to come. \nThis event will be followed by an all-day workshop on Saturday\, September 5\, on Mark Alznauer’s forthcoming book\, Hegel’s Sole Idea: The Last Great Metaphysical System (Chicago\, 2026).
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/what-does-it-mean-that-the-idea-is-the-truth/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building\, Room 418\, 170 St. George Street\, Toronto\, Ontario\, M5R 2M8\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Mark-Alznauer-x-225-h.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260905T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260905T170000
DTSTAMP:20260811T183252Z
CREATED:20260811T183130Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260811T183252Z
UID:35301-1788598800-1788627600@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Workshop on Hegel's Sole Idea with Mark Alznauer
DESCRIPTION:The workshop will be about Prof. Mark Alznauer’s forthcoming book\, Hegel’s Sole Idea: The Last Great Metaphysical System (Chicago\, 2026). \nMore information to come. \nContact Nick Stang (nick.stang@utoronto.ca) for workshop materials.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/workshop-on-hegels-sole-idea-with-mark-alznauer/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building\, Room 418\, 170 St. George Street\, Toronto\, Ontario\, M5R 2M8\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Hegels-Sole-Idea-225-h.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260918T153000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260919T181500
DTSTAMP:20260812T151754Z
CREATED:20260807T145426Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260812T151754Z
UID:35214-1789745400-1789841700@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:2026 Toronto Colloquium in Medieval Philosophy: A Celebration of Deborah Black
DESCRIPTION:Please join us for the 2026 edition of the University of Toronto Colloquium in Medieval Philosophy. \nProgram\nFRIDAY\, SEPTEMBER 18\nSession I (3:30 – 6:00 pm) \nMartin Pickavé (University of Toronto): Welcome\nStephen Dumont (University of Notre Dame): Deborah as a Scholar\, Friend\, and Colleague\nPeter Adamson (LMU Munich): What’s Truth Got to Do with It? Logic as (Mere) Instrument in Philosophy of the Islamic World \nSATURDAY\, SEPTEMBER 19\nSession II (9:30 am – 12:00 pm) \nGinger Hegedus (Western University): Kalamic Mutations in the Thought of al-Qirqisāni and Ashʿarī\nKara Richardson (Syracuse University): Avicenna on Nature as a Stable Efficient Cause \nSession III (1:45 – 4:15 pm) \nLuis Xavier López-Farjeat (Universidad Panamericana): Ibn Bājja on Imagination and Intellection: An Alternative Interpretation against Averroes’s Reconstruction\nTaneli Kukkonen (NYU Abu Dhabi): Averroes on Past and Future Infinity \nSession IV (4:30 – 6:15 pm) \nStephen Ogden (University of Notre Dame): Avicenna’s Emanationism and Aquinas’s Critique\nDeborah Black: Closing Remarks \nAll sessions are free and open to the public and will be held in Room 100 of the Jackman Humanities Building (170 St. George Street). \nThe colloquium is sponsored by the Department of Philosophy\, the Collaborative Specialization in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy\, the Centre for Medieval Studies\, and St. Michael’s College. \nOrganizers: Reza Hadisi\, Peter King\, Jon McGinnis\, and Martin Pickavé.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/2025-toronto-colloquium-in-medieval-philosophy-a-celebration-of-deborah-black/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building 100
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George,UTM,UTSC
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Medieval-scene-325-x-225.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260925T150000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260925T170000
DTSTAMP:20260605T141847Z
CREATED:20260603T182330Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260605T141847Z
UID:34788-1790348400-1790355600@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Bringing Quine and Lewis Back Together
DESCRIPTION:Speaker: Barry Loewer (Rutgers) \nThis talk examines connections between Quine’s epistemology of science and Lewis’ metaphysics of science and their different conceptions of naturalness. I develop a metaphysical account of nomological modalities and fundamental properties Lewisian in spirit but dispensing with his possible worlds and his version of naturalness in favor of probabilities and a Quinean notion of naturalness. This account\, called “the Package Deal Account of laws and chances” (PDA)\, is constructed out of Quine’s epistemology of science. The result is an account of the metaphysics of laws and other nomological modalities that combines features of Quines’ epistemology and Lewis’ physics and brings their views closer together.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/bringin-quine-and-lewis-back-together/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building\, Room 418\, 170 St. George Street\, Toronto\, Ontario\, M5R 2M8\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Faculty.-Barry-Lower.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20261003T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20261003T183000
DTSTAMP:20260605T194300Z
CREATED:20260605T193948Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260605T194300Z
UID:34795-1791018000-1791052200@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Linguistic Internalism and Externalism: Bridging Medieval and Contemporary Thought
DESCRIPTION:Join us for a one-day workshop on linguistic internalism and externalism featuring Peter King (University of Toronto)\, Gyula Klima (Fordham University)\, Simone L. Migliaro (Humboldt University\, Berlin – University of Toronto)\, Calvin Normore (University of California\, Los Angeles)\, Claude Panaccio (Université du Québec à Montreal)\, and Giorgio Pini (Fordham University). \nThe distinction between internalism and externalism has shaped much of the contemporary analytic debate on the nature and function of language. Internalism encompasses theories holding that the meaning of an expression is primarily determined by internal states—more simply\, by what is in the speaker’s mind. Externalism\, by contrast\, assigns greater weight to factors outside the subject\, such as the linguistic community or causal relations to the external world. This distinction initially emerged to contrast the descriptivist and broadly internalist approaches of authors such as Gottlob Frege or Noam Chomsky with the externalist accounts developed by Saul Kripke and Hilary Putnam. \nThe debate\, however\, remains vibrant and continues to inspire new interpretations and refinements. There is broad agreement that\, by the late Middle Ages\, a coherent and systematic approach to the analysis of language and its proprerties had begun to develop. This development produced a sophisticated theoretical framework\, traditionally known as logica modernorum\, and sparked new debates that challenged several assumptions of the Aristotelian tradition. Prevailing positions held that linguistic meaning was essentially determined by concepts—and thus by the subject’s internal cognitive grasp—yet this account did not seem to convince authors such as John Duns Scotus or William of Ockham. Some scholars have therefore proposed classifying their theories as externalist\, in order to distinguish them from more traditional internalist accounts. This interpretative move\, however\, has not been universally accepted and has at times faced substantial methodological criticism. \nThis workshop aims to advance the discussion by creating a forum for exchange between experts in contemporary analytic philosophy and scholars of medieval thought. Framed around the internalism-externalism distinction\, it seeks to evaluate how effectively this framework can illuminate medieval theories of language. While the structural parallels between certain contemporary analyses and late medieval developments are undeniable\, it remains to be determined how philosophically fruitful and historically justified these comparisons are\, and whether the conceptual differences between the two contexts constitute a limitation or\, conversely\, a theoretical opportunity. \nQuestions the workshop aims to answer: • What do we mean by internalism and externalism? • To what extent can medieval theories of language be meaningfully classified in terms of the internalism–externalism dichotomy? • To what extent do medieval theories resemble contemporary accounts? And in what respects do they differ? • Are these differences a limitation or an opportunity? \n 
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/linguistic-internalism-and-externalism-bridging-medieval-and-contemporary-thought/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building 100
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR