BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Department of Philosophy - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Department of Philosophy
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Toronto
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20240310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20241103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20260308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20261101T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250501T100000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250501T120000
DTSTAMP:20260422T150415
CREATED:20250221T160415Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250224T151253Z
UID:32375-1746093600-1746100800@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:History of Philosophy Research Group Talk (Stephen Peprah\, Toronto)
DESCRIPTION:The History of Modern Philosophy Group is pleased to welcome as its guest speaker Stephen Peprah\, a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Toronto\, currently working with Rachel Barney. His interests lie in ancient philosophy\, early modern philosophy\, metaphysics\, and ethics. One of his current research projects focuses on the philosophical works of Anton Wilhelm Amo\, an eighteenth-century Ghanaian-German slave-turned-academic (three of Amo’s philosophical works remain extant). Another of Dr. Peprah’s book projects is tentatively titled “Plato on the Individual\, Polis\, and Political Authority in the Republic.” \nTalk Title\nAnton Wilhelm Amo on Practical Philosophy \nTalk Abstract\n\nAnton Wilhelm Amo is now known mainly for his metaphysical views: the mind and body are exclusively distinct\, such that they can only relate through a commerce (commercio). But his conception of practical philosophy has not received attention. This paper’s goal is twofold: to account for Amo’s practical philosophy and to defend the view that his epistemology and metaphysics have direct relation with his practical philosophy. To these effects\, the paper advances three claims. First\, it argues that for Amo\, whenever we engage in philosophy\, we are (ought to be) inseparably connected with three main aims: (a) the act of understanding and willing by which we are concerned with things in themselves (b) to know them distinctly and adequately; and (c) the application of the acquired knowledge to perfecting humanity and nature. Therefore\, for Amo\, the contemplative life ought necessarily to culminate in practical life. Second\, it shows how Amo’s metaphysics and epistemology are necessary conditions for his practical philosophy. It concludes that for Amo\, ethical problems (human and ecological crisis) result from epistemic failures. \n\nOne of six departmental Research Interest Groups\, the History of Philosophy Group explores topics in ancient and/or medieval philosophy\, the period from Descartes to Kant\, and Jewish philosophy from the medieval period to the 20th century.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/history-philosophy-group-talk-stephen-peprah-toronto/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building\, Room 418\, 170 St. George Street\, Toronto\, Ontario\, M5R 2M8\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George,UTM,UTSC
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/stephen-peprah-philosophy-utoronto-guest-lecturer.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250501T150000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250501T170000
DTSTAMP:20260422T150415
CREATED:20250331T144927Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250331T160226Z
UID:32592-1746111600-1746118800@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Kant & Post-Kantian Philosophy Group Talk (Neil Sinhababu\, Singapore)
DESCRIPTION:The Kant & Post-Kantian Philosophy Group is delighted to welcome as its guest speaker Neil Sinhababu\, an associate professor of Philosophy at the National University of Singapore. Dr. Sinhababu’s areas of research include ethics\, Nietzsche\, political philosophy\, metaphysics\, as well as philosophy of mind and action. \nTalk Title\nNietzsche and the Eternal Recurrence \nTalk Abstract\nThe idea of the eternal recurrence is that everyone will live the exact same lives again an infinite number of times. Nietzsche appreciates that this would multiply the value of a single life by infinity\, justifying intense emotional responses. His unpublished notes anticipate Poincaré’s recurrence theorem with a cosmological argument for the eternal recurrence. Thus Spoke Zarathustra describes its hero discovering this argument and struggling to accept the resulting infinities of everything bad in his life. He eventually comes to love the eternal recurrence because it provides infinities of everything good in his life. \n  \nThe Kant & Post-Kantian Philosophy Group is a a subgroup of the History of Philosophy Research Group\, which focuses on European philosophy in Kant and post-Kantian traditions.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/post-kantian-talk-neil-sinhababu-singapore/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building\, Room 418\, 170 St. George Street\, Toronto\, Ontario\, M5R 2M8\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George,UTM,UTSC
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Neil-Sinhababu-utoronto-philosophy-guest-photo-by-Leah-De-La-Torre.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Nick Stang":MAILTO:nick.stang@utoronto.ca
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250502
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250505
DTSTAMP:20260422T150415
CREATED:20250124T225656Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250423T153028Z
UID:32253-1746144000-1746403199@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Other Epistemic Achievements - Global Perspectives
DESCRIPTION:To explore alternate pathways for theorizing epistemic achievements and virtues\, this three-day conference brings together scholars from 10 different philosophical traditions to engage in debate and discussion. These include perspectives from some Africana\, Arabic\, Chinese\, Early Modern European\, Greek\, Indigenous Andean\, Jewish\, Latin American\, Medieval Latin\, and South Asian traditions.  \nSpeakers\n\n\n\n\n\nZeyad El Nabolsy (York University)\, Participation as an Epistemic Achievement in African Philosophy\nMaria Heim (Amherst College)\, “Some hold back and some overreach; only those with eyes see”: Buddhaghosa on Learning How to See\nJing Iris Hu (Concordia): What Does Standing in Comparison to Moral Exemplars Tell Us about Ourselves?\nJari Kaukua (University of Jyväskylä)\, Between Epistemic Optimism and Pessimism: Before and after Avicenna\nTamer Nawar (Barcelona)\, The Epistemic Implications of Divine Omniscience and Foreknowledge\nYitzhak Melamed (Hopkins)\, The Apikorsut of the Void: A Heresy beyond All Heresies\nChristiana Olfert (Tufts)\, What Is the Aim of Pyrrhonian Skepticism?\nKristin Primus (Berkeley)\, Our Knowledge of Thought\nJorge H. Sanchez-Perez (Alberta)\, The Harmony of Reality and the Duties of Knowledge: Epistemic Humility and Moral Obligations\nClinton Tolley (UC San Diego)\, “In xóchitl in cuícatl”: Flower\, Song\, and the (‘Romantic’) Elevation of the Aesthetic Dimension of Truth and Knowledge in Ancient and Modern Mexican Philosophy\n\nRead the full program and schedule \nThis event is jointly hosted by the Departments of Philosophy at the University of Toronto and Toronto Metropolitan University\, with additional support from the Centre for Medieval Studies and the Vice-Dean\, Research & Infrastructure\, Faculty of Arts & Science\, University of Toronto. For more information\, check the event website.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/other-epistemic-achievements/
LOCATION:Ontario
CATEGORIES:Alumni,Graduate,St. George,Undergraduate,UTM
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Other-Epistemic-Achievements-Leonora-Carrington-And-Then-We-Saw-the-Daughter-of-the-Minotaur.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250505
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250510
DTSTAMP:20260422T150415
CREATED:20250228T043454Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250421T174347Z
UID:32381-1746403200-1746835199@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Second Kumārila Conference
DESCRIPTION:Kumārila ranks among the key Sanskrit thinkers\, and his massive influence has forever changed the course of Sanskrit philosophy\, from Buddhist epistemology to Nyāya ontology. This conference\, held at the Department of Philosophy on the St. George campus\, is the second time international experts on Kumārila’s philosophy can come together to discuss his masterpieces. These experts will workshop their translations of some of Kumārila’s works in two-hour reading sessions. Sessions will see us both reading and commenting on selected passages on a given topic (e.g.\, adhikāra in Ṭupṭīkā 6.1) and hearing a talk on the topic itself (e.g.\, mapping the intersection of adhikāra and sāmarthya). A discussion session will follow. Additionally\, scholars and advanced students will have the opportunity to present their Kumārila-related research in shorter\, 60-minute sessions. \nThe conference is coordinated by Elisa Freschi and Nilanjan Das and will see the participation of other experts in Sanskrit philosophy and philology. \nConfirmed Participants\n\nTarinee Awasthi\nHugo David\nAlessandro Ganassi\nAlessandro Graheli\nKei Kataoka\nMalcolm Keating\nLawrence McCrea\nJohn Nemec\nMonika Nowakowska\nAndrew Ollett\nSarju Patel\nParimal Patil\nJonathan Peterson\nAkane Saito\nTaisei Shida\nLong Yin Sin\nElliot Stern\nAlex Watson\nKiyotaka Yoshimizu\n\nFind the full program schedule. \nThis will be an in-person only event\, since we believe in the power of collective intelligence and collaboration\, which are challenging to replicate when some participants speak on Zoom while others are in the room. \nThe organizers gratefully acknowledge support for the conference from the Departments of Philosophy at UTSG and UTM\, as well as the Office of the Vice-Principal\, Research\, and the Decanal Fund at UTM. \n 
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/kumarila-conference-2/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building 100 & 401\, 170 St. George Street\, Toronto\, ON\, M5R 2M8\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Alumni,Graduate,St. George,Undergraduate,UTM
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Kumarila-Conference-text-T_4340_0009-courtesy-of-Lalchand-Research-Library-Ancient-Indian-Manuscript-Collection-DAV-College-Chandigarh-event.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250505T150000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250506T140000
DTSTAMP:20260422T150415
CREATED:20250424T152706Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250501T234119Z
UID:32728-1746457200-1746540000@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Kant & Post-Kantian Philosophy Group Talk and Workshop (Clinton Tolley\, UC San Diego)
DESCRIPTION:The Kant & Post-Kantian Philosophy Group is delighted to welcome Clinton Tolley as its guest speaker for two separate lectures on May 5 (3-5 PM) and May 6 (12-2 PM). Dr. Tolley is a professor of Philosophy at UC San Diego and works in the areas of the history of modern philosophy\, philosophy of culture\, and social philosophy. He also serves as affiliated faculty in German studies\, Latin American Studies\, and the Interdisciplinary Program in Cognitive Science at UCSD. Dr. Tolley coordinates the History of Philosophy Roundtable and the Phenomenology Research Group there\, as well as co-coordinating (with Manuel Vargas) the Mexican Philosophy Lab. \nTalk Title Lecture 1\n(Monday\, May 5\, 2025\, 3-5 PM)\nKant on the Existence of the Objects of the Ideas of Reason \nTalk Abstract Lecture 1\nThe largest part (by far) of the Critique of Pure Reason (roughly half of the 880 page B-edition) is devoted to Kant’s investigation into the possibility that ‘pure reason’ is a source not just of representations\, concepts\, or ‘thoughts’\, but of true cognitions and knowledge about things themselves. While this focus seems fitting\, given the work’s title\, Kant’s interpreters have been split in several directions as to what Kant takes himself to have accomplished in this section\, and also why its task requires so many pages.  In some circles it has been common to see the first 350 pages (in the ‘Aesthetic’ and ‘Analytic’) as having already positively established the limits of human cognition\, in terms of the interaction of the faculties of sensibility and the understanding in experience\, which leaves to the analysis of pure reason (in the ‘Dialectic’) only the negative task of fending off ‘illusions’ that any further cognition is possible via those concepts (‘ideas’) which are distinctive of pure reason.  Especially of late\, however\, others have sought to go beyond this sort of ‘negativism’ concerning cognition by pure reason\, by highlighting a more positive role in relation to cognition that Kant eventually proposes for pure reason and its ‘ideas’ — namely\, their use in ‘regulating’ activity of the understanding itself and its cognitions in experience.  Here I will go farther still and argue that\, by the end of the Dialectic\, Kant means to establish something even more positive and ‘objective’ than either the ‘negativists’ or even the ‘regulativists’ allow — namely\, that pure reason can and does achieve true cognitions and knowledge about the existence of the objects of its ‘ideas’\, i.e.\, achieves a kind of cognition and knowledge of these things themselves. \nTalk Title Lecture 2\n(Tuesday\, May 6\, 2025\, 12-2 PM)\nKant and Hegel on the Relation of Reason to Spirit \nTalk Abstract Lecture 2\nIt has been a common and effective strategy\, especially of late\, to try to find pathways into Hegel’s idealism by tracing out the marks of Hegel’s engagement with Kant\, in order to then use Hegel’s overlaps with\, and departures from\, more familiar theses from Kant to provide interpretive guidance for how to understand Hegel’s own position.  Here I want to take the opposite approach\, and explore the possibility that Hegel’s speculative development of a philosophy of ‘spirit’\, on the basis of his own dialectical examination of reason in the Phenomenology\, can function as an interpretive guide for how best to understand the version of ‘spiritualist’ metaphysics that Kant himself ultimately takes to form the contents of reason’s ‘belief’\, as a result of his own critique of pure reason.  By reading Kant’s Critique ‘speculatively’\, rather than just ‘dialectically’\, I will aim\, first\, to foreground the fact that Kant agrees with Hegel in taking dialectical reflection on reason to provide grounds for a commitment to a conception of the absolute as itself a ‘substance which is subject’\, to use Hegel’s own gloss on the term ’spirit’.  I will also aim\, secondly\, to sharpen the comparative-interpretive question of to what extent (if at all) the Phenomenology’s transition from ‘Reason’ to ‘Spirit’ is meant to be\, in and of itself\, a critique of the conclusions of Kant’s own critique of reason\, if Kant and Hegel ultimately agree that dialectical reflection on reason yields grounds not just for the necessity of the formation of the ‘idea’ of spirit\, but also for the rational commitment to the real existence of spirit itself. \n  \nThe Kant & Post-Kantian Philosophy Group is a a subgroup of the History of Philosophy Research Group\, which focuses on European philosophy in Kant and post-Kantian traditions.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/post-kantian-talk-and-workshop-clinton-tolley-us-san-diego/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building\, Room 519
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George,UTM,UTSC
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Clinton-Tolley-utoronto-philosophy-guest-1.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Nick Stang":MAILTO:nick.stang@utoronto.ca
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250508T150000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250508T170000
DTSTAMP:20260422T150415
CREATED:20250212T224752Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250414T141236Z
UID:32350-1746716400-1746723600@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:CANCELLED--Kant & Post-Kantian Philosophy Group Talk and Workshop (Lucy Allais\, University of the Witwatersrand & Johns Hopkins)
DESCRIPTION:Unfortunately\, this event can no longer take place at this time. \nThe Kant & Post-Kantian Philosophy Group is delighted to welcome Lucy Allais as a speaker. Dr. Allais is a professor of Philosophy at the University of the Witwatersrand and the Miller Professor of Philosophy at Johns Hopkins University. Her research interests include the philosophy of Immanuel Kant as well as forgiveness\, punishment\, and bioethics. \nIn addition to her talk on Thursday\, May 8\, Dr. Allais will also be giving a workshop on Friday\, May 9\, 10 AM-5 PM. For more information and to register\, please contact Nick Stang. \nTalk Title\nTBD \nTalk Abstract\nTBD \nTalk Abstract\nIn addition to this lecture\, Dr. Allais will host an all-day workshop on May 9. Those interested in participating should email Nick Stang (nick.stang@utoronto.ca) ahead of the event.  \nThe Kant & Post-Kantian Philosophy Group is a a subgroup of the History of Philosophy Research Group\, which focuses on European philosophy in Kant and post-Kantian traditions.
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/kant-post-kantian-philosophy-group-talk-and-workshop-lucy-allais-university-of-the-witwatersrand-johns-hopkins/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building\, Room 418\, 170 St. George Street\, Toronto\, Ontario\, M5R 2M8\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Lucy-Allais-events.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Nick Stang":MAILTO:nick.stang@utoronto.ca
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250509T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250509T170000
DTSTAMP:20260422T150415
CREATED:20250502T032742Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250502T052922Z
UID:31876-1746781200-1746810000@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Memory Distortions across the Lifespan: Theoretical and Empirical Issues
DESCRIPTION:Join us for a workshop on aging and memory\, organized by Sara Aronowitz (University of Toronto) and Jay Richardson (Université Grenoble-Alpes). \nThe study of memory distortions and confabulation has been a central driver of progress in understanding the functioning of human memory. The prevalence and etiology of these errors seem to have a characteristic developmental trajectory along with somewhat predictable breakdown patterns in ageing. How does the study of mnemic error across the lifespan inform the prevalent taxonomies of memory systems? Might it lead to insights into the nature of successful remembering? What might be the theoretical consequences\, if any\, of comparing the development and decline of accuracy and precision in memory? When it comes to philosophical theorizing\, the function of memory is usually studied in abstraction from differences across the lifespan. But age-related differences in memory raise important questions about what a success or failure of memory means. The purpose of this workshop is to bring together researchers from empirical and theoretical fields to start to ask these questions.   \nSpeakers\n\nDonna Rose Addis (Toronto)\nBailey Agard (Toronto)\nSara Aronowitz (Toronto)\nBryan Hong (Toronto)\nJohannes Mahr (York)\nRyan Panela (Toronto)\nDenis Perrin (Grenoble-Alpes)\nJay Richardson (Grenoble-Alpes)\n\n\nSchedule\n9:20-9:30 AM \nWelcome \n9:30-10:30 AM \nDonna Rose Addis \n10:30-11:00 AM \nRyan Panela \n11:00-11:30 AM \nCoffee break \n11:30 AM-12:30 PM \nDenis Perrin \n12:30-1:30 PM \nLunch (catered) \n1:30-2:30 PM \nJohannes Mahr \n2:30-3:00 PM \nBailey Agard \n3:00-3:30 PM \nJay Richardson \n3:30-4:00 PM \nCoffee Break \n4:00-4:30 PM \nBryan Hong \n4:30-5:30 PM \nSara Aronowitz
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/workshop-on-aging-and-memory-aronowitz/
LOCATION:Jackman Humanities Building\, Room 519
CATEGORIES:Graduate,St. George,UTM,UTSC
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Memory-Distortions-325-x-225-px.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Sara Aronowitz":MAILTO:s.aronowitz@utoronto.ca
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250512
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20250517
DTSTAMP:20260422T150415
CREATED:20250407T162021Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250407T162021Z
UID:32595-1747008000-1747439999@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Sanskrit Reading and Translation Workshop: Vācaspati Miśra on Yogic Perception
DESCRIPTION:The aim of this workshop\, organized by Elisa Freschi and Nilanjan Das\, will be to read and translate a critique of an influential Buddhist theory of yogic perception offered by the Sanskrit philosopher and polymath\, Vācaspati Miśra (9th/10th century)\, in his commentary Nyāyakaṇikā on Maṇḍana Miśra’s (8th century) Vidhiviveka. \nFor many Buddhist philosophers\, the insight that paves the way for awakening is an experience that presents things as they truly are: as suffering\, as impermanent\, and so on. It is the experience of things as the Buddha taught them through Four Truths of the Noble Ones (caturāryasatya). Buddhist epistemologists in the tradition of Dharmakīrti (7th century) call this experience ‘yogic perception’ (yogipratyakṣa). In Nyāyakaṇikā\, Vācaspati attacks Dharmakīrti’s theory of yogic perception. \nVācaspati’s critique is both historically significant in the context of studying Indian Buddhist philosophy. In the relevant section of the text\, Vācaspati engages with a range of Buddhist authors—not just Dharmakīrti but also other figures like Dharmottara\, Prajñākaragupta and Kamalaśīla. In this respect\, the text is an invaluable source of historical information about how Buddhist theories of yogic perception were received and interpreted by non-Buddhist thinkers towards the end of the first millennium CE. In turn\, Vācaspati himself became a target of attack for later followers of Dharmakīrti such as Jñānaśrīmitra (10th century) and Ratnakīrti (11th century). Thus\, without a proper understanding Vācaspati’s challenge for Dharmakīrti\, huge swathes of later Yogācāra texts like Jñānaśri’s Yoginirṇayaprakaraṇa and Ratnakīrti’s Sarvajñasiddhi are unintelligible. \nThe workshop will bring together leading experts\, junior scholars\, and graduate students whose research focuses on Buddhist and Mīmāṃsā philosophy. \nConfirmed Participants\n\nJed Forman (Simpson College)\nAlessandro Graheli (Toronto)\nBhikṣu Hejung (Joongang Sangha University)\nParimal Patil (Harvard)\nAkane Saito (Vienna)\nDavey Tomlinson (Villanova)\nLee Ling Ting (Vassar College)\n\nIf you are interested in participating\, please contact Nilanjan Das. \nThe organizers are grateful to the decanal fund at UTM\, the Centre for South Asian Critical Humanities at UTM\, and the Ho Centre for Buddhist Studies at U of T\, for funding the workshop and for helping with logistics. \n 
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/vacaspati-misra-on-yogic-perception/
LOCATION:MN 3230\, University of Toronto Mississauga
CATEGORIES:Alumni,Graduate,St. George,Undergraduate,UTM
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/Vacaspati-Misra-on-Yogic-Perception.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20250523T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20250524T180000
DTSTAMP:20260422T150415
CREATED:20250509T184820Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250523T173018Z
UID:32796-1748005200-1748109600@philosophy.utoronto.ca
SUMMARY:Second Toronto Bioethics Workshop
DESCRIPTION:We are pleased to announce the second Toronto Bioethics Workshop for Friday\, May 23 & Saturday\, May 24\, on U of T’s St. George (downtown) campus. \nThe theme of the workshop this year is public bioethics. \nThe Pulitzer Prize–winning  journalist Katie Engelhart\, whose work focuses on medicine and ethics\, will serve as this year’s keynote speaker. \nSchedule\nFriday\, May 23\n1:00–2:15 pm \nPeter Zuk \nMental Privacy\, Self-Expression\, and Hermeneutical Injustice \n  \n2:30–3:45 pm \nLukas J. Meier \nYour Automated Clinical Ethicist Will See You Now \n  \n4:00–5:15 pm \nAdelle Goldenberg \nA Pro-Choice\, Anti-Ableist Abortion Politics \n  \nSaturday\, May 24\n9:00–10:15 am \nMark Ornelas & Carmen Taylor \nTreating Sickle Cell Disease: An Ethical Case Study for Base-Pair Gene Editing \n  \n10:30–11:45 am \nWayne Sumner \nWhat’s So Special about Medically Assisted Dying? \n  \nBREAK \n  \n1:15–2:30 pm \nAndrew J. Baldassarre \nPain Management as a Failed Proxy for Wellbeing \n  \n2:45–4:00 pm \nPrabhpal Singh \nResisting Commonsense and Taking Abortion Rights Serious \n  \n4:15–5:45 pm \nKatie Engelhart (keynote speaker) \nThe Moral of the Story: Reporting from the Frontline of Bioethics
URL:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/event/second-toronto-bioethics-workshop/
LOCATION:Centre for Ethics\, 200 Larkin\, 15 Devonshire Place\, Toronto\, ON\, Canada
CATEGORIES:Alumni,Graduate,St. George,Undergraduate,UTM,UTSC
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://philosophy.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2nd-Annual-Toronto-Bioethics-Workshop-325-x-225-px.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR